A belt, suspenders, and duc(k/t)* tape
I mentioned in last week's program that I'd recorded the podcast on Thursday. That's because I was out of town during the weekend—in Pittsburgh to photograph the wedding of my older daughter's best friend. Knowing that if anything can possibly go wrong, it will, and that if nothing can possibly go wrong, it still will, I did everything I could to safeguard the images. I shot all of the images in raw mode to get the best possible quality for each image, but that meant that every image was 6 to 10 MB in size. After the reception, I copied all of the images to my notebook computer's hard disk. Then I burned two DVDs as a backup and to backup the backup, I copied all of the pictures onto thumb drives.
|
*So which is it—duck tape or duct tape? And is the stuff really any good on ducts or ducks?
Masking tape was invented in the 1920s by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (later 3M) and the gray cloth sticky stuff came along in World War II. There's general agreement on that. It was invented by Johnson and Johnson's Permacel Division (based on medical tape).
One history site says the original stuff was waterproof (doubtful) and that it was used to keep moisture out of ammunition cases. It was certainly water resistant and people called it "Duck Tape". It's also worth noting that the stuff was made from "cotton duck", which was used in cloth medical tapes. Soldiers realized that they could fix things with the stuff and used it to hold things together.
When the war ended and the housing industry started booming, the tape (now colored gray to match duct work instead of army green) held ducts together and the name shifted to "Duct Tape".
It's not really a good choice for duct work because it dries out and falls off. And although it's water resistant, it's certainly not water proof. It's also air permeable. But it still holds the universe together. |
When I got home, I copied the images to the desktop computer's hard drive and then made an image of the directory on an external drive that I normally keep at the office. Then I could format the camera's memory cards and the thumb drives. I still had copies of the originals on DVD, the images were on another backup drive by midweek, and all of the files will eventually be stored as part of my online backup at Carbonite. Clearly these are pictures I wouldn't want to lose.
Stored in as many locations as they are, the wedding pictures consume about 30GB of disk space: 6GB on the desktop, 6GB on each of 2 backups that are here in town, 6GB on DVDs, and 6GB on a Carbonite drive. In the mid 1980s, that much storage space would have cost about $3 million. Today I can buy a 500GB external hard drive for less than $125 -- and that's enough to store more than 16 weddings' worth of photos at 30GB per wedding. So in mid-80s terms, that's about $50,000,000 worth of disk space.
What's a picture worth?
Is a picture worth 1000 words? If so, what's a word worth? Is a word worth more if it's part of a business plan or if it's part of your high school sophomore's term paper for history? Either way, you wouldn't want to lose it or the words surrounding it. In the old days, it didn't matter what happened to pictures as long as we had the negatives. You could always have another print made. But today many of us look at photos on the screen and, to Kodak's chagrin, we don't have prints made. So if you lose the data on the hard drive, you've effectively lost both the pictures (what you view) and the negatives (what you use to create new pictures.)
That's why it's so important to have everything backed up.
At the very least, you should be sure that you have at least 2 copies of the files before you delete the files from the camera's memory card. One of those copies should be in another building: DVDs that you create and then store in a bank safe deposit box, take to the office, or give to a relative for safekeeping are a good choice. So is an external hard drive that you store in a safe location. Or an online backup service such as Carbonite.
The leopard prepares to spring
The next version of Apple's operating system (OS X 10.5, also known as Leopard) will be available later this week. Although this version is more evolutionary than revolutionary, Apple's marketing honchos still point to 300 enhancements that will accompany the cat.
Apple calls Time Machine "a giant leap backward" because it's a quick and easy backup system. Backups can be complicated because people often don't understand the differences between operating system files, program files, data files, and hidden files. They don't understand the difference between a full backup, a differential backup, an incremental backup, and cloning a disk.
Time Machine makes it simple. Maybe a bit too simple. The backup system lacks granularity, which is a complicated way of saying that your choices are "all" or "nothing". Maybe you want to backup the photos from your niece's wedding, last year's family reunion, and your son's high school graduation but you don't particularly want to back up test pictures you made of the cats, audio files you created from CDs that you own, or the files you brought home from the office to work on and then took back. If you want that kind of functionality, Time Machine won't work for you. But for a lot of people, it will make possible a real backup for the first time because all you need to do is buy an external drive, plug it in, allow Leopard to find it, and say that you want to use it as a backup drive. Easy.
Boot Camp, the Apple function that allows you to run Windows or the Mac OS on your Intel-powered Mac has been improved. If you install Windows on the Mac, you'll be able to read and write Windows files so long as you format the Windows partition as a FAT32 drive. Boot Camp can read FAT32 drives, but it's still incapable of reading an NTFS volume, which is a better choice for Windows. Of course, if you have a Mac and you're installing Windows on it, you're probably doing it for compatibility and not because you want to run Windows most of the time.
If you use your Mac to watch DVDs, you'll like the new and improved screen interface and Leopard includes some technology that allows it to recover the program from some damaged DVDs so that the show will go on even if there's a problem with the disc.
It should be an interesting week for Mac users.
Greenpeace bites the Apple Iphone
Greenpeace says scientific tests show that Apple's Iphone contains hazardous chemicals, some of which are no longer used by other mobile phone makers. This despite a claim by Steve Jobs that Apple is "ahead of, or will soon be ahead of, most of its competitors" on environmental issues. The environmental action group bought a phone and sent it to a research laboratory in the UK. The results weren't good.
The independent laboratory tested 18 internal and external components and confirmed the presence of brominated compounds in half the samples along with a mixture of other toxic chemicals. "Steve Jobs has missed the call on making the iPhone his first step towards greening Apple's products," said Zeina Alhajj, Greenpeace International toxics campaigner, who noted that Nokia sells mobile phones free of PVC.
You can see a slide show of how the phone was disassembled for testing.
Greenpeace found that the battery was glued and soldered to the handset, which hinders battery replacement and makes separation for recycling, or appropriate disposal, more difficult. The organization claims that Nokia, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson sell phones with fewer unsafe chemicals and that Nokia and Sony Ericsson have better take-back policies for recycling and that those firms accept responsibility for reuse and recycling of phones, unlike Apple.
For the full report, see "Missed call: the iPhone's hazardous chemicals" (PDF document) on the Greenpeace website.
Stupid spam of the week
Two for the price of one this week. Within minutes of each other, I received two spams that encouraged me to apply for "honest work" with a "real company" and promised that "no investment" was required. Both of these firms wanted to pay me a lot of money for doing very little. You'll probably question my intelligence, but I passed up both offers.
Become employed today in a respectable international company and reach the financial success. (no investment required)
Serious jobs for serious people. No investment needed.
You may notice a certain amount of similarity between the two messages. They came "from" two different addresses and were sent to two of my addresses—addresses that I don't use for normal correspondence.
How could this go wrong?
Bankrate.com explains how these cons work.
These "offers" certainly are scams. What kind of scam isn't clear, but BankRate says it might be a "reshipper" scam. The Federal Bureau of Investigation says this is a common scam that makes the victim an unwitting accomplices to crime.
You start with an offer that leads to an elaborate, official-looking website for the bogus company. When you arrive, you fill out an employment application that asks for Social Security number and date of birth. After a short delay, you're "hired". The spams I received didn't include any website links, but it did include an e-mail address where I could contact the prospective employer. (How many real businesses do you know have human resources departments that use Gmail addresses for recruiting?)
Once you're hired, you receive packages that you're told to repackage and ship them overseas. You have to use your own money, of course, but the "company" promises to reimburse you. The packages will be from Internet-based firms and the contents will have been purchased using stolen credit card numbers.
So now you've received stolen merchandise and shipped it overseas. But to add insult to injury, you'll receive your reimbursement by means of a check for more than you spent. You'll be instructed to deposit the check and send the excess to the overseas bank account of your "employer". Seems fair enough, doesn't it?
The problem is that a week or two later your bank will report that the "cashier's" check was a forgery. You're now out whatever you spent to send the stolen goods overseas and the additional cash that you sent overseas. And you're a criminal.
But, wait! There's more! Your "employer" has your name, address, birth date, social security number, and other important information. You'll soon find out that "you" have several new credit cards that have been used to buy merchandise that has been shipped to the next generation of fools who bought in to the scam.
The only people who will be caught up in a scheme such as this are greedy people who think that they will get something for nothing. They won't and I can't feel too sorry for them.
Nerdly News
The pump-and-dump MP3 trick
Creeps who buy penny stocks and then send official-looking tips aimed at convincing suckers to buy the stocks based on the assumption that the price will go up have a new trick. Instead of sending their spams in plain text, or as attached GIFs, or as attached PDFs, now they're using attached MP3 files. You may think someone has sent you a music track, but it's really a spam that uses a computer generated voice (usually not well recorded) to pump a stock.
These schemes work well for the scam artists. As soon as the price starts to go up, they dump the stock they bought for a penny on the schmo who's willing to pay 10 pennies. If you buy it at 10 cents, expecting it to go to 50 cents, you lose. As suckers buy the stock, the spammers sell it and the price drops back to where it was when they started. Or lower.
"Hello! This is an investor alert," the recording starts. It then describes a stock you've never heard of for a company that has supposedly just reinvented the wheel or sliced bread. The company's future is bright, of course, and the stock is about to explode.
Many of these messages probably won't make it through to corporate addresses. Many companies already stop messages that contain MP3 files because the files are often music files that could create legal problems for the company. The stock-pumping MP3s will be caught in the same snare.
The pump-and-dump stock schemes account for about a quarter of all spam.
If only I'd bought Google when it was under $100 per share
Or maybe not. I've learned that the best way to kill a stock is to buy some of it. Twenty years ago this week I was midway through a 2-week stay in Manhattan. Black Monday was the result. The stock market crashed. So far I haven't bought any Google stock and the company continues to fly high. Very high.
Google beat expectations this week in reporting quarterly profits that were 13 cents more than Wall Street expected. In the past quarter, Google hired more people than at any time in its (short) existence as a public company. It's been a good week for Silicon Valley companies: Yahoo, Ebay, Intel, Seagate, and Genentech all had good news for investors.
Google's chief financial officer (who will retire this year) George Reyes says the company benefited from improvements made in the quality of ads it shows to users of the Google search engine.
Net income increased 46% and a share of Google stock returned $3.38 to investors. Google's stock closed at $639.62 on Thursday, up about 39% from the beginning of the year or more than 600% since the company went public. And the company has added more than 2000 employees this quarter. Chief executive Eric Schmidt says the large number of new hires was the result of college graduations. Three hundred new employees came from Google's acquisition of Postini.
|