Corel Graphic Suite X3
X is 10, so version X3 is 13. Whether Corel chose X3 because of superstition involving the number 13 or because the letter X is sexy or because they just couldn't let a good pun like X3 slide by, I don't know. Long-time Corel users know about the "even-number curse" but they also know that the odd-number releases are usually solid. Fortunately, several versions ago, Corel decided to stop trying to fill every new version with hundreds of new features and instead to concentrate on making the application work better. There is one long-time bug that I keep hoping the company will fix and with every version to date I've been disappointed. Some things just never change.
It's not a devastating bug, just an annoyance that I can work around. But it's a bug that everyone from Rick Altman (who has some influence in Ottawa) on down to people like me have complained about for years. The usual response from Corel is that "it's operating as designed". That may be true, but the design is wrong.
Here's my pet bug: Exporting a file from Corel Draw to a Web format such as GIF offers the user two options: Turn off antialiasing and get sharp color breaks with the corresponding "jaggies" or turn on antialiasing for smooth transitions. Logic suggests antialiasing for smooth transitions and that's the right choice. The problem is that Corel Draw also antialiases the edges of the containing rectangle.
The result is a rectangle that has a frame around it. If you want the borders of the graphic to disappear (and that's exactly what most people want) you'll be disappointed with the result.
Here are 2 black 100-pixel by 100-pixel squares inside a table with a black background and 10-pixel cell padding. The black of the image should be the same as the table background.
The image on the left has antialiasing turned off and the border disappears. The image suffers from a bad case of the jaggies, though. On the right, the antialiased image is much smoother, but there's a line on the left side of the image and at the bottom. In previous versions, there would have been a border on all 4 sides. Does this suggest that Corel got the output algorithm half right in X3 and that the border might finally disappear in X4? I've been complaining about this problem since ... ah, maybe version 8 or 9. Assuming 18-month program cycles, that's the larger part of a decade and still it's only half right.
Until Corel fixes this problem, the workarounds involve correcting the edges by hand in an application such as Corel PhotoPaint or exporting the image slightly oversize and then using another application to trim it so that the ugly edges are cut off. It doesn't take a lot of time to fix the problem, but the point is that you shouldn't have to fix the problem.
C'mon guys -- get this right in the next version. If it really is "operating as designed", change the damn design!
Really cool features
Now that I've gotten that out of my system, let's look at some of the balls Corel has hit out of the park. The first of these isn't even part of the application. It's a book that Corel includes in the box. Insights from the Experts is a slim (75-page) booklet that shows how 7 graphic artists use Draw to create invitations, to put designs on T-shirts, to cut vinyl signs, to create a cartoon, to generate art for a billboard, and to create a realistic drawing. I like this approach because it shows real people using the application for real-life tasks. Whether you're a new user or one who goes back to wire frames, this booklet is well worth your time.
Setting the background to be transparent on the object at the right eliminated the vertical and horizontal lines, so maybe Corel is more than 50% of the way toward fixing the problem I grumbled about previously. The hard-edged antialiasing around the circle would have been less obvious if I'd drawn on a background closer to the color of the website, so consider that operator error.
What I'm showing at the right is Draw X3's Smart Fill tool. My design-school daughter says that Corel borrowed this feature from Adobe Illustrator. That may be and Corel has admitted for years that it's willing to reverse-engineer the best features of other applications when those features can make its applications better. The Smart Fill tool recognizes intersections of lines and constricts fill to within the boundaries it recognizes.
The Smart Fill tool will apply only solid fills, but that restriction is eliminated once you've added a solid fill. You can then select one of the filled areas and apply a gradient fill.
That's what I've done with the image at the left. The outer ring has a green-red gradient and one of the inner rings has a green-purple gradient.
Some things stay the same
I saw Corel Draw in New York City in the early 1980s. The person demonstrating the application pointed out the "sparse tool set" and that's something Draw has maintained for more than 20 years.
What this means is that the user isn't overwhelmed by huge numbers of tools. Corel Draw has a lot of tools, but the tools are grouped in logical collections.
The screen capture at the left shows all of the tools Corel Draw offers. I find the interface far less intimidating than that used by most competing programs.
The small black triangles indicate that "related" tools are stored under the icon. The example I've selected is the crop tool. Related tools include the knife, the eraser, and the rather obscurely named "virtual segment delete".
Every tool except the selection tool and the text tool is combined with related tools.
Random thoughts
Tools-Options-General: The undo level now defaults to 20 instead of 99 or 100. This is enough levels of undo and the lower number reduces the memory required to run the application. My first recommendation for many previous versions of Draw was to change this setting to 10 or 20.
Autocorrect has now added automatic hyperlinks. I consider this feature evil in Word and Excel. If I want something to be a link, I'll make it a link. Will applications developers please stop adding this feature! I also always turn off "correct 2 initial capitals" because if I write "PCs", I want it to stay "PCs" and not be changed to "Pcs".
I like to have several zoom tools available all the time, so one of the first things I do in the customization section is create a command bar with zoom, zoom in, zoom out, and zoom to page. I then park this command bar directly below the main tool bar at the left of the screen.
I change the offset for duplicates from a quarter of an inch to the right and up a quarter of an inch to zero and zero. Please allow me to place the duplicate where I want it.
Draw now allows users to set a bleed area. This simplifies the process of creating documents with full bleed for professional printing.
Nudge is still set at 0.10 inch! This isn't my definition of a nudge. Set it to 1 point, 1 pixel, 0.01 inch, or 0.001 inch. Almost anything is better than the default!
The default is still to center new power-clip contents. The goal is to keep new users from wondering where something went when they power clip it, but experienced users are always shocked to find that an object they carefully positioned has been centered. If you know what you're doing with power clips, turn this "feature" off in the edit dialog.
Overall: Corel Graphics Suite X3: 4 cats.
Yeah, there are shortcomings and that's why CGS X3 earns 4 cats instead of 5, but there's no question that this is the best Corel Draw ever and that it continues to be the best choice for a lot of people. Unfortunately, there is no longer a Mac version, which means that graphics professionals won't be able to use it unless they're willing to fire up a Windows machine. To learn more, visit the Corel website.
Is any amount of disk space "Too Much"?
I've told the story more than once of buying a 16MB hard drive for around $1000. Now, of course, a 16MB flash drive is something you might find in your breakfast cereal as a prize. 500MB flash drives go for $20 or so. And even 1GB flash drives can be had for less than $50. I'm astonished whenever I think of having more than 1TB of disk space on-line and I recently bought 300GB of storage for less than $150. The disk drive (a rebate was involved) cost less than $100 and, because the disk drive was a Seagate SATA unit, I had to pay more than expected for a case with a USB2 connection. Overall, I spent less than $150 for the drive and the case. That works out to about about 5 cents per MEGABYTE instead of $63 per megabyte. Wow!
Take a look at "Disk 4" at the right. This is a Seagate SATA drive with a capacity of 300GB. I purchased the drive for less than $100, after rebate. I thought I was buying a standard EIDE drive and was surprised when I opened the box and found a SATA (serial ATA) drive inside.
I'd planned to put the drive in an external case that I'd had lying around for a while, but the case was for standard EIDE drives. It didn't have any serial ATA connections, either data or power. And the cases I found in my initial search were in the $75 and up range.
Then I found a case (from China, of course) for about $20. I ordered it and it arrived a few days later. It's a neat case -- thick aluminum with the appropriate hardware for attaching the drive to the base.
It's formatting as I type this and will probably be used as a backup drive. It has enough space to back up the data on my primary data drive for a long time.
But if you add up the space available on the drives connected to my computer, you may be as surprised as I am:
- C = 200 GB (installed boot drive)
- D = 500 GB (installed data drive)
- M = 200 GB (music and photographs, external USB device)
- N = 150 GB (mainly work files, external USB device)
- Y = 300 GB (new external backup, external USB device)
That's more than a terabyte of storage space attached to my computer. I keep hearing that a terabyte will be standard on even notebook computers within 10 years and I'm still amazed because I remember headlines in computer magazines that asked "Is 1GB enough?" and I remember when 16MB seemed like more space than anyone would ever need.
Clearly, 16 MB wasn't enough. Neither was 1GB. And neither will be1TB. As we continue to depend on computers to store our music, our photos, and our lives, there is no such thing as too much disk space.
Nerdly News
Same old pony with new tricks
You already know not to follow a link that's supposedly from your bank, PayPal, or a store if it claims that you should "confirm" your information. But what about calling a telephone number?
A new batch of e-mail messages that claim to come from PayPal say that the recipient's account has been used fraudulently. But there's no link. Instead, the message tells the recipient to call a phone number to verify their account information.
Call the number and you'll hear an automated voice: "Welcome to account verification. Please type your 16 digit card number." Presumably, once you do that you'll be asked other questions (PIN, security code, and such) so that the criminal can make purchases using your credit card.
Instead of clicking the link in a standard phishing e-mail, you know to type the appropriate URL into your browser. Instead of calling a phone number in a questionable e-mail, look up the number. If the message purports to be from your bank, look on the back of your credit or debit card and call the number that's there. If the message claims to be from some other organization, visit their website and obtain the number from there.
This laptop is really hot!
You may have heard about the Dell laptop computer that exploded and burst into flames at a conference in Japan. The technology publication Inquirer has photos of the event and Dell is hoping for fast answers to explain what happened.
|
The photos here are from The Inquirer. Larger versions are on the publication's website. |
|
Dell has confirmed that the computer in the pictures is one of theirs. The company says Dell's engineering teams are working with the Consumer Product Safety Commission and a third-party failure analysis lab to determine the root cause of this failure and to ensure we take all appropriate measures to help prevent a recurrence.
Dell has suggested that the most likely cause is the laptop's lithium ion battery unit. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has found problems with these batteries in the past. Apple, Dell, and HP have all had to recall computers with these batteries because of safety concerns.
Maybe laptop computers should always be placed on a desk.
|